Skip to main content

If the State Pension age rises to 68 earlier than planned what would it cost to bridge the gap?

Date: 15 July 2026

2 minute read

15 July 2026

If you are covering reports that the rise in the State Pension age to 68 might be brought forward according to OBR documents, please see the following comment from Adam Cole, retirement specialist at Quilter:
 
"Reports that the state pension age might rise to 68 sooner than currently legislated will be unwelcome news for many workers approaching retirement. However, it is also a stark reminder of a reality that policymakers have been grappling with for years, which is as we live longer and the population ages, the cost of providing a state pension becomes increasingly difficult to sustain.
 
"The state pension remains the bedrock of retirement income for millions of people, but there is a growing mismatch between the number of people drawing it and the number of working-age taxpayers funding it. In that context, future increases to the state pension age are not especially surprising. Indeed, if governments wish to maintain the generosity of the state pension, particularly under the triple lock, raising the state pension age becomes one of the few levers available to control costs.
 
"The triple lock has undoubtedly been successful in improving pensioner incomes and reducing pensioner poverty. However, it has also created a significant fiscal commitment. While politically popular, it raises legitimate questions about long-term sustainability, particularly when public finances are already under pressure and younger generations are facing the prospect of working longer before they can access their state support.
 
"Rather than relying solely on government provision, individuals should view developments like this as a reminder of the importance of building their own retirement savings. The good news is that the figures involved are often less daunting than people expect. Our calculations* suggest that someone aged 49 could build a fund capable of replacing a year's projected state pension with contributions costing just over £50 a month after basic-rate tax relief. Even someone aged 55 could potentially achieve the same outcome for around £75 a month net.
 
"While no one welcomes changes to the goalposts, these examples highlight the power of starting early. Small, regular pension contributions, combined with tax relief and investment growth over time, can provide valuable flexibility and help reduce dependence on an increasingly stretched state pension system.
 
"The debate around the future of the state pension is unlikely to disappear. Whether through changes to the triple lock, further state pension age increases or a combination of both, future retirees should expect reform to remain firmly on the agenda. For many people, the best defence against that uncertainty is to take greater ownership of their retirement planning today."

Alex Berry

External Communications Manager